Dataset: Election Study 1980 (Data Pool)

Variable M252.1: Q.106(1) CDU/CSU LOST 1

Literal Question

Q.106. WHAT FACTORS WERE, IN YOUR MIND, RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
FACT THAT THE CDU/CSU LOST SO MANY VOTES?

Q.106(1). FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR CDU/CSU LOSS OF VOTES:
FIRST MENTION
------------------------------------------------------------

01. FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS; BECAUSE OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS
02. NOBODY WANTED THIS CHANCELLORSHIP CANDIDATE, WRONG
CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR
03. THE BAD PUBLICITY FOR STRAUSS
04. STRAUSS IS/WAS TOO RADICAL, NO TRUST IN STRAUSS,
FEAR OF STRAUSS
05. BAD CAMPAIGN, INFIGHTING DURING THE CAMPAIGN, DIRTY
LINEN WAS AIRED DURING THE CAMPAIGN, UNFAIR
CAMPAIGN, DISGUSTING CAMPAIGN
06. WRONG CAMPAIGN, WRONG STRATEGY, WRONG ARGUMENTS
07. PLATFORM WAS NO GOOD, CDU/CSU HAD NO REAL PLATFORM
08. YOUNG VOTERS AT FAULT, YOUNG VOTERS VOTED
INCORRECTLY
09. YOUNG VOTERS WERE NOT APPROACHED CORRECTLY, OTHER
PARTIES PROGRAMS APPEALED MORE TO YOUNG VOTERS
10. STRAUSS WAS THE WRONG CANDIDATE FOR THE YOUNG
VOTERS, STRAUSS DID NOT APPEAL TO THE YOUNG VOTERS
11. CDU/CSU WAS NO REAL ALTERNATIVE, OPPOSITION HAD
NOTHING BETTER TO OFFER
12. FAULT OF THE MEDIA, INCORRECT PRESENTATION OF THE
OPPOSITION IN THE MEDIA, AIR TIME FOR THE
OPPOSITION WAS TOO SHORT
13. NORTH-SOUTH DIFFERENTIAL, STRAUSS DID NOT APPEAL TO
THE NORTH
14. CSU WOULD HAVE DONE BETTER NATIONWIDE
15. THE NORTH DESERTED STRAUSS, ONE CANNOT TRUST THE
PRUSSIANS
16. TIMING OF THE CAMPAIGN, CAMPAIGN BEGAN TOO LATE, 4
WEEKS LATER EVERYTHING WOULD HAVE COME OUT
DIFFERENTLY
17. FDP IS AT FAULT, FDP TOOK (TOO) MANY VOTES FROM THE
OPPOSITION
18. THE LEADERSHIP TEAM WAS NO GOOD, THERE WERE NO GOOD
PEOPLE IN THE LEADERSHIP TEAM
19. THE SPD HAD THE BETTER CAMPAIGN
20. OTHER POINTS ABOUT STRAUSS
21. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE OPPOSITION
22. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN
23. OTHER (IF NOT CODED ELSEWHERE)


00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER
99. NA
............................................................


German Question Text

Values Categories N
1 F.J. STRAUß 361
 38.8%
2 FALSCHER KANDIDAT 230
 24.7%
3 HETZE GEGEN STRAUß 43
 4.6%
4 STRAUß ZU RADIKAL 39
 4.2%
5 MIESER WAHLKAMPF 54
 5.8%
6 FALSCHER WAHLKAMPF 19
 2.0%
7 PROGRAMM NICHT GUT 18
 1.9%
8 SCHULD DER JUNGWÄHLER 12
 1.3%
9 PROGRAMM JUNGWÄHLER 5
 0.5%
10 STRAUß-JUNGWÄHLER 3
 0.3%
11 KEINE ALTERNATIVE 10
 1.1%
12 SCHULD DER MEDIEN 4
 0.4%
13 NORD-SÜD-GEFÄLLE 21
 2.3%
14 CSU-BUNDESWEIT 2
 0.2%
15 NORDEN NICHT STRAUß 3
 0.3%
16 ZEITPUNKT ZU SPÄT 2
 0.2%
17 FDP HAT SCHULD 7
 0.8%
18 FÜHRUNGSMANNSCHAFT 10
 1.1%
19 SPD-WAHLKAMPF BESSER 4
 0.4%
20 ANDERES ZU STRAUß 14
 1.5%
21 ANDERES, OPPOSITION 18
 1.9%
22 ANDERES, WAHLKAMPF 12
 1.3%
23 ANDERES 39
 4.2%
0 TNZ 10985
99 KA 71

Summary Statistics

Valid cases 930
Missing cases 11056
This variable is numeric

Download

Metadata Index

This is the Metadata Index for a Nesstar Server.
Nesstar is a tool used for analysing, visualising and downloading datasets.

Click the "Explore Dataset" button to open the dataset.