Dataset: Election Study 1980 (Data Pool)

Variable M252.2: Q.106(2) CDU/CSU LOST 2

Literal Question

Q.106(2). FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR CDU/CSU LOSS OF VOTES:
SECOND MENTION
---------------------------------------------------------

< SEE Q.106 FOR COMPLETE QUESTION TEXT>

01. FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS; BECAUSE OF FRANZ-JOSEF STRAUSS
02. NOBODY WANTED THIS CHANCELLORSHIP CANDIDATE, WRONG
CANDIDATE FOR CHANCELLOR
03. THE BAD PUBLICITY FOR STRAUSS
04. STRAUSS IS/WAS TOO RADICAL, NO TRUST IN STRAUSS,
FEAR OF STRAUSS
05. BAD CAMPAIGN, INFIGHTING DURING THE CAMPAIGN, DIRTY
LINEN WAS AIRED DURING THE CAMPAIGN, UNFAIR
CAMPAIGN, DISGUSTING CAMPAIGN
06. WRONG CAMPAIGN, WRONG STRATEGY, WRONG ARGUMENTS
07. PLATFORM WAS NO GOOD, CDU/CSU HAD NO REAL PLATFORM
08. YOUNG VOTERS AT FAULT, YOUNG VOTERS VOTED
INCORRECTLY
09. YOUNG VOTERS WERE NOT APPROACHED CORRECTLY, OTHER
PARTIES PROGRAMS APPEALED MORE TO YOUNG VOTERS
10. STRAUSS WAS THE WRONG CANDIDATE FOR THE YOUNG
VOTERS, STRAUSS DID NOT APPEAL TO THE YOUNG VOTERS
11. CDU/CSU WAS NO REAL ALTERNATIVE, OPPOSITION HAD
NOTHING BETTER TO OFFER
12. FAULT OF THE MEDIA, INCORRECT PRESENTATION OF THE
OPPOSITION IN THE MEDIA, AIR TIME FOR THE
OPPOSITION WAS TOO SHORT
13. NORTH-SOUTH DIFFERENTIAL, STRAUSS DID NOT APPEAL TO
THE NORTH
14. CSU WOULD HAVE DONE BETTER NATIONWIDE
15. THE NORTH DESERTED STRAUSS, ONE CANNOT TRUST THE
PRUSSIANS
16. TIMING OF THE CAMPAIGN, CAMPAIGN BEGAN TOO LATE, 4
WEEKS LATER EVERYTHING WOULD HAVE COME OUT
DIFFERENTLY
17. FDP IS AT FAULT, FDP TOOK (TOO) MANY VOTES FROM THE
OPPOSITION
18. THE LEADERSHIP TEAM WAS NO GOOD, THERE WERE NO GOOD

PEOPLE IN THE LEADERSHIP TEAM
19. THE SPD HAD THE BETTER CAMPAIGN
20. OTHER POINTS ABOUT STRAUSS
21. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE OPPOSITION
22. OTHER POINTS ABOUT THE CAMPAIGN
23. OTHER (IF NOT CODED ELSEWHERE)

00. INAP., ASKED ONLY IN OCTOBER; NO SECOND MENTION
99. NA
............................................................


German Question Text

Values Categories N
1 F.J. STRAUß 18
 9.8%
2 FALSCHER KANDIDAT 17
 9.2%
3 HETZE GEGEN STRAUß 11
 6.0%
4 STRAUß ZU RADIKAL 8
 4.3%
5 MIESER WAHLKAMPF 22
 12.0%
6 FALSCHER WAHLKAMPF 9
 4.9%
7 PROGRAMM NICHT GUT 17
 9.2%
8 SCHULD DER JUNGWÄHLER 3
 1.6%
9 PROGRAMM JUNGWÄHLER 3
 1.6%
10 STRAUß-JUNGWÄHLER 2
 1.1%
11 KEINE ALTERNATIVE 8
 4.3%
12 SCHULD DER MEDIEN 2
 1.1%
13 NORD-SÜD-GEFÄLLE 4
 2.2%
14 CSU-BUNDESWEIT 0
 0.0%
15 NORDEN NICHT STRAUß 0
 0.0%
16 ZEITPUNKT ZU SPÄT 2
 1.1%
17 FDP HAT SCHULD 5
 2.7%
18 FÜHRUNGSMANNSCHAFT 6
 3.3%
19 SPD-WAHLKAMPF BESSER 0
 0.0%
20 ANDERES ZU STRAUß 6
 3.3%
21 ANDERES, OPPOSITION 12
 6.5%
22 ANDERES, WAHLKAMPF 11
 6.0%
23 ANDERES 18
 9.8%
0 TNZ 11802
99 KA 0

Summary Statistics

Valid cases 184
Missing cases 11802
This variable is numeric

Download

Metadata Index

This is the Metadata Index for a Nesstar Server.
Nesstar is a tool used for analysing, visualising and downloading datasets.

Click the "Explore Dataset" button to open the dataset.